VW Vortex - Volkswagen Forum banner

02 Audi TT Dyno

25K views 15 replies 5 participants last post by  BeasTToftheEast 
#1 ·
* Chassis: MK1 Audi TT
* Turbo: HTA 3076r .82 A/R
* Displacement: 2008cc
* Software: Eurodyne Maestro 7
* Injectors: Injector Dynamics 1000cc
* Exhaust Manifold: Custom Tubular Manifold
* Intake Manifold: SEM
* Cams: Cat Cams 3658
* Purpose: Daily Driver on beast mode




free screen capture


free pic
 
See less See more
2
#3 ·
Awesome numbers. I hope to hit 450 on a .63 a/r. Is that a Small port head?

Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk
 
#5 ·
That is fantastic.
I've made 425whp with a 3076 .63 on my 16v. 034 waste spark
You only pulled 4 deg of timing?
I know the bore size and combustion chamber design determine the ignition curve
I'd like to compare you map to where mine is.
I have been conservative due to no DET detection on my setup.
I have been studying the Maestro 7 software and I am planning on swapping in a AWW OBD2
EFI into my ride. Super sequential and knock control w/ IAC is what I want.
 
#8 ·
First of all awd cars lose about 25% through the drivetrain which would make around 640 to the crank. Second of all it wasn't just pump it also had direct port meth injection. Last Dynojet when setup properly are usually no more than a +-5% off actual hp output, but then again no company that produces dynomometers does enough R&D to be considered the industry standard. So it's really a moot point. The only purpose a dyno really has is tuning against yourself and constantly making progress.

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk
 
#10 ·
That's 100% correct. It is a moot point but if the difference is up to 30-40...50hp with the common sense. 640hp(even 550)@the crank at 26.5psi/2008cc/ 7300rpm - NO f'king way! WMI is not a +100hp miracle. Your 3076 can support 550hp. 25% AWD loses is plain BS (I'm sorry to say that). Whoever told you that, it is far away from the reality and only serves unfulfilled power goals.
 
#11 ·
Maybe a GT3076r however apparently you aren't well versed with the HTA turbos. They produce 8lbs more flow per minute and spool considerably quicker. Also awd setups do lose anywhere from 20-25% sometimes more. Last wmi is not the save as race gas obviously, but it would effectively bring the octane up to almost 100 and aggressively lower intake temps especially with direct port jets. All of those details taken into consideration kind of throw your mentality out the window.

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk
 
#13 ·
Sure, your WMI lowers mostly the cyl temps but also takes part of the place for the incoming air. WMI doesn't burn neither add O2 to the mixture, and you do need much more O2/air than 59lb for 640hp. Just think about it. At 26.5 psi and 7300 rpm your engine just doesn't receive enough air for the stated power level.
Look man, I'm not offensive. It is simple math behind that. It is not compulsory to accept my point. Everyone is free to believe whatever he/she wants.
Cheers!:beer:
 
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top